Longitudinal Study of Two Virtual Cursors for People With Motor Impairments: A Performance and Satisfaction Analysis on Web Navigation

The lack of dexterity in the upper limbs of people with motor impairments may prevent the use of standard pointing devices, such as mice, to access graphical user interfaces. In these cases, pointing and clicking are usually performed by means of alternative devices such as joysticks, trackballs or standard keyboards. However, target acquisition can still be challenging for this group of people due to their physical condition. Based on previous works, we developed two virtual cursors: the novel cross cursor and the standard area cursor. They are devoted to assist two different groups of users with link selection within web pages: keyboard-only users, and joystick and trackball users, respectively. Both virtual cursors have been evaluated and compared with the original unassisted cursor in a longitudinal study. Eight people with motor impairments participated in an unsupervised experiment from their own personal computers at home. For a period of six weeks, each participant used both a virtual cursor and the original unassisted cursor to freely navigate the Web, and to perform predefined target acquisition tasks. Interaction data was automatically logged throughout the study along with subjective assessments concerning the usability of the virtual cursor being tested. Results show significant improvements for both virtual cursors in six of the seven cursor parameters studied, albeit with performance variations between some participants. The virtual cursors were extensively used for free web navigation and in their subjective assessments both were positively endorsed by participants who also put forward improvement suggestions for future developments

Inclusive Web Empirical Studies in Remote and In-Situ Settings: A User Evaluation of the RemoTest Platform

Web accessibility evaluation requires tests to be carried out with real users with disabilities performing real tasks or activities. To recruit an appropriate group of users and to observe their performance in the real world is difficult. For this reason we have developed RemoTest, a platform that assists researchers designing experiments, conducting remote and in-situ experimental sessions and analyzing the data gathered while the users are accessing the Web. Although this tool is oriented to experimenters, it is necessary to check whether the evaluation environments created by RemoTest are accessible or not to the users that participate in the tests. To this end, we conducted formal in-situ evaluations with 36 users with diverse characteristics. For this assessment, the participants were asked to install the platform, to fill in some automatically created questionnaires and to carry out several web navigation tasks. From the data gathered we analyzed the ease of the installation process, the accessibility of the automatically generated questionnaires, and user satisfaction. The results revealed the suitability of the platform for conducting inclusive experiments both in remote and in-situ contexts and provided guidelines on how the experiments should be set out.This research work was developed within the project eGovernability, funded by the Spanish Government, Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness, and the European Regional Development Fund, under grant (TIN2014-52665-C2-1-R MINECO/FEDER). J.E.P. holds a PhD Scholarship from the University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU). Some of the authors are members of the EGOKITUZ/ADIAN research team, supported by the Basque Government, Department of Education, Universities and Research under grant (IT980-16)

Evaluation of two virtual cursors for assisting web access to people with motor impairments

People with motor impairments (MI) may face accessibility barriers when using computers due to their health conditions and therefore need to use alternative devices to a standard mouse for pointing and clicking in graphical user interfaces (GUI). In this study with users of different pointing devices, we evaluate 2 virtual cursors (the novel cross cursor and the standard area cursor) implemented for assisting link selection on the Web by reducing respectively cursor displacement and the precision required. Both cursor adaptations were developed for this work based on previous research, and have been compared with the original unassisted cursor in a web-based study with fifteen regular computer users applying their usual pointing device. Nine participants with MIs participated, including 4 using keyboards as an alternative pointing device, 4 joystick users and 1 trackball user. Six participants without MIs also participated in the study applying a standard mouse to complete the same experimental tasks. User interactions with the pointing device, as well as subjective assessments about the usability of the cursor variants tested were gathered from study participants. An in-depth analysis of point and click trajectories showed that virtual cursors improved the effectiveness and efficiency of most participants with MIs in link selection. Subjective assessments about cursor variants tested showed that a majority of participants with MIs generally preferred one of either the two virtual cursors to the original one for web navigation